IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v42y2025i2p545-552.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

N‐Factorial Scenarios: A Systems‐Theoretical Approach to Scenario‐Planning

Author

Listed:
  • Steffen Roth
  • Austė Kiškienė
  • Dovilė Gaižauskienė
  • Jari Kaivo‐oja

Abstract

Scenarios are among the most popular techniques for managing the uncertainty and complexity of the future. Even the more sophisticated scenario designs, however, often reduce the future to a narrow set of typically only two key factors that are arranged into a four‐square matrix representing four distinct yet interrelated scenarios. Consequently, scenarios have been criticised for being simplistic or reductionist by design. In this article, we address these criticisms by proposing a basic design for n‐factorial scenarios. Following a short discussion of the procedures and limitations of classical scenario design, we draw on the example of a standard 2 × 2 matrix titled ‘Four Scenarios for the Digital Transformation’ to illustrate the limitations of the standard approach and demonstrate the potential of a digital approach to scenario building. We conclude that standard scenario planning is often characterised by a systematic omission of potentially critical scenarios, which our proposed digital approach can detect and map out.

Suggested Citation

  • Steffen Roth & Austė Kiškienė & Dovilė Gaižauskienė & Jari Kaivo‐oja, 2025. "N‐Factorial Scenarios: A Systems‐Theoretical Approach to Scenario‐Planning," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(2), pages 545-552, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:42:y:2025:i:2:p:545-552
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.3120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.3120
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.3120?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:42:y:2025:i:2:p:545-552. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.