IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v42y2025i2p360-373.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unilateral consensus: Legitimation as a societal phenomenon in Luhmannian systems theory

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Pretorius
  • Gunter Bombaerts
  • Madis Talmar
  • Bob Walrave

Abstract

For Niklas Luhmann, the political system's primary function is the establishment of decision premises for future decisions, with these decisions being applied across different societal subsystems. However, Luhmann recognized that this resulted in the political system running the risk of de‐differentiating itself when producing collectively binding decisions. Luhmann solved this problem by restricting the political system's role, relegating it to society's sidelines. But there are many examples of where we would want the benefits of collectively binding decisions in society, such as planning systems. This raises the question how can we have decisions that serve as premises for future decisions across societal subsystems while maintaining each system's differentiation and legitimacy? To answer this question, we will redouble our focus on meaning in considering each system's legitimation process. Through the lens of meaning, we will show how legitimation can bring independent systems to make shared decisions, thus producing unilateral consensus.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Pretorius & Gunter Bombaerts & Madis Talmar & Bob Walrave, 2025. "Unilateral consensus: Legitimation as a societal phenomenon in Luhmannian systems theory," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(2), pages 360-373, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:42:y:2025:i:2:p:360-373
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.3069
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.3069
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.3069?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:42:y:2025:i:2:p:360-373. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.