IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v41y2024i1p134-152.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding the technical and social paradoxes of learning management systems usage in higher education: A sociotechnical perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammed Ali
  • Trevor Wood‐Harper
  • Bob Wood

Abstract

The recent COVID‐19 pandemic has created an unprecedentedly complex situation and wicked problem in the education domain. This has forced educators and learners to study from home using unfamiliar pedagogical typologies and technologies in order to adapt to the new work routine. This research contributes to theory and practice by adopting a sociotechnical approach (STS) to understand the technical and social implications of learning management systems (LMS) to inform pedagogical development. A qualitative approach is adopted, and semi‐structured interviews are conducted across two university cases with 40 academics and students to capture their perceptions of LMS usage. We found that technical paradoxes present a barrier to pedagogical development in the transition from blended learning environments to remote ones, where many wicked and unprecedented challenges emerge from learning remotely during a pandemic, while social paradoxes arise from cultural issues such as user resistance that impede the university's pedagogical goals and visions.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammed Ali & Trevor Wood‐Harper & Bob Wood, 2024. "Understanding the technical and social paradoxes of learning management systems usage in higher education: A sociotechnical perspective," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(1), pages 134-152, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:41:y:2024:i:1:p:134-152
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.2945
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2945
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.2945?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:41:y:2024:i:1:p:134-152. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.