IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v40y2023i2p301-311.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Objective understanding of the principle of relativity (Methodological theses)

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander Bogdanov

Abstract

Einstein's special and general theories of relativity are easily understandable and present no contradictions to a scientific worldview that from the very start understands objectivity to be the product of the cognition of collective humanity. The mysteries and paradoxes of Einsteinian relativity are a consequence of thinking in bi‐subjective terms, of only two observers who move away from one another, and they are removed when considered from the perspective of systems of interconnected elements that are in motion, and when the subjectivity of individual observers and the fact that a deforming environment always exists between an object and its image are taken into account.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander Bogdanov, 2023. "Objective understanding of the principle of relativity (Methodological theses)," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 301-311, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:40:y:2023:i:2:p:301-311
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.2940
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2940
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.2940?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:40:y:2023:i:2:p:301-311. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.