IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v36y2019i4p395-403.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining Moral Frameworks in Negotiation Practice: A Critical Systems Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Luis Arturo Pinzon‐Salcedo
  • Silvia Elena Ramírez‐Tovar
  • Maria Alejandra Torres‐Cuello

Abstract

Negotiations are part of systemic interventions. Because moral frameworks affect goal setting and decision‐making processes in negotiation, they can have an important effect in systemic interventions. In this paper, we use critical systems thinking to improve our understanding of the structure of moral frameworks and judgments in negotiation. We explore several moral frameworks that are applied in negotiation, and we demonstrate how boundary critique can be employed to understand and deal more reflexively and holistically with moral judgments that are part of negotiations in systemic interventions. By adopting a critical perspective of our assumptions and rationality in negotiation practice, we attempt to show how to open negotiations that are part of systemic interventions to more reflexive and informed possibilities. This can help us to avoid implementing changes in a systemic intervention that promote moral perspectives, which are not based on a holistic and reflexive exploration of the stakeholders' moral frameworks. © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Luis Arturo Pinzon‐Salcedo & Silvia Elena Ramírez‐Tovar & Maria Alejandra Torres‐Cuello, 2019. "Examining Moral Frameworks in Negotiation Practice: A Critical Systems Perspective," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(4), pages 395-403, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:36:y:2019:i:4:p:395-403
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.2554
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2554
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.2554?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:36:y:2019:i:4:p:395-403. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.