IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v35y2018i4p369-385.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Team Formation Using a Systems Thinking Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Maria‐Isabel Sanchez‐Segura
  • Mirsad Hadzikadic
  • German‐Lenin Dugarte‐Peña
  • Fuensanta Medina‐Dominguez

Abstract

Team performance varies depending on the organization of their members, the exploitation of their synergies and their planning to optimally meet the minimum requirements with the best results. This article reports a dual‐purpose methodology. First, we use the soft systems methodology to start up viability‐driven teamwork based on team complexity, a better understanding of idiosyncrasy, and the synergies leveraging team behavior. The viable systems model is used to propose the essential functions of a team that effectively operates in dynamic organizational environments. Second, this research provides guidance for training teams to apply holistic thinking in their problem‐solving practice by helping them to co‐integrate and apply systemic approach for immersive problem solving. In essence, this article reports success drivers, generic teamwork structures and viability accomplishment references for agilely, effectively and synergistically launching teams. We wrap up by discussing the lessons learned from applying this approach to several teams and outline future developments. © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria‐Isabel Sanchez‐Segura & Mirsad Hadzikadic & German‐Lenin Dugarte‐Peña & Fuensanta Medina‐Dominguez, 2018. "Team Formation Using a Systems Thinking Approach," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(4), pages 369-385, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:35:y:2018:i:4:p:369-385
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.2536
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2536
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.2536?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:35:y:2018:i:4:p:369-385. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.