IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v29y2012i2p104-115.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lessons from the Trenches: Twenty Years of Using Systems Thinking in Natural Resource Conflict Situations

Author

Listed:
  • Steven E. Daniels
  • Gregg B. Walker

Abstract

Natural resource management is rich with systems complexity, which is amplified when interest group politics and tactics create an overlay of strategic behaviors. For the past two decades, systems thinking techniques have comprised a key part of the Collaborative Learning facilitation methodology in natural resources management and environmental policy decision making. This essay focuses specifically on the contribution that systems thinking makes to the facilitation of natural resource conflict, drawing upon broad observations drawn from a number of applications. The discussion provides a context for understanding the systemic complexity of natural resource conflicts, offers a brief summary of a particular systems‐based facilitation paradigm (i.e. Collaborative Learning), and then presents a set of lessons that have emerged from 20 years of application. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Steven E. Daniels & Gregg B. Walker, 2012. "Lessons from the Trenches: Twenty Years of Using Systems Thinking in Natural Resource Conflict Situations," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 104-115, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:29:y:2012:i:2:p:104-115
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.2100
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2100
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.2100?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fachao Li & Chenxia Jin & Ying Jing & Marzena Wilamowska‐Korsak & Zhuming Bi, 2013. "A Rough Programming Model Based on the Greatest Compatible Classes and Synthesis Effect," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 229-243, May.
    2. Corrine Nöel Knapp & Robin S. Reid & María E. Fernández-Giménez & Julia A. Klein & Kathleen A. Galvin, 2019. "Placing Transdisciplinarity in Context: A Review of Approaches to Connect Scholars, Society and Action," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-25, September.
    3. Steven E. Wallis, 2020. "Integrative Propositional Analysis for developing capacity in an academic research institution by improving strategic planning," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(1), pages 56-67, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:29:y:2012:i:2:p:104-115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.