IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v99y2018i3p945-961.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When the Going Gets Tough: Issue Environments and Gendered Negativity Strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Kjersten Nelson

Abstract

Objective In theory, gender expectations may influence candidate's negativity strategies. However, these gender expectations interact with other factors, such as party expectations and the election's issue environment. This study seeks to determine if candidate gender, opponent gender, and issue environment affect negativity strategies. Methods The study analyzes the ads purchased by U.S. congressional candidates in the 2004 and 2008 election cycles. Results The analyses show that gender and party expectations, moderated by the issue environment of the election, affect levels of negativity. Democratic women and Republican men appear to be particularly sensitive to these contextual changes. Conclusion The results bolster other findings that gender expectations are moderated by party expectations, as well as context dependent. In addition, given that women report more reluctance to run for office based on the potential of being involved in a negative campaign, the results provide insight as to why more women are not running for office.

Suggested Citation

  • Kjersten Nelson, 2018. "When the Going Gets Tough: Issue Environments and Gendered Negativity Strategies," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 99(3), pages 945-961, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:99:y:2018:i:3:p:945-961
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12465
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12465
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.12465?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:99:y:2018:i:3:p:945-961. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.