IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v99y2018i3p1089-1104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Should I Stay or Should I Go? Open Enrollment Decisions and Student Achievement Trajectories

Author

Listed:
  • Deven Carlson
  • Lesley Lavery
  • Tyler Hughes

Abstract

Objective Analyze achievement trajectories of students who transfer out of their district of residence via Colorado's interdistrict open enrollment policy. Methods Drawing on a data set containing annual individual‐level records from the universe of students attending Colorado public schools between 2005–2006 and 2009–2010, we estimate the achievement trajectories of open enrollment participants via ordinary least squares (OLS) models containing student fixed effects. Results and Conclusion Our analyses indicate that the achievement of open enrollment participants gradually declines in the years leading up to their transfer. After open enrolling, students whose participation is stable through the duration they are observed in our data exhibit small achievement gains, but those who reenroll in their district of residence exhibit additional small declines. On average, those who use open enrollment as a long‐term education option tend to enroll in districts that are more advantaged on traditional measures of educational quality than their district of residence.

Suggested Citation

  • Deven Carlson & Lesley Lavery & Tyler Hughes, 2018. "Should I Stay or Should I Go? Open Enrollment Decisions and Student Achievement Trajectories," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 99(3), pages 1089-1104, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:99:y:2018:i:3:p:1089-1104
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12478
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12478
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.12478?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:99:y:2018:i:3:p:1089-1104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.