IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v99y2018i3p1021-1037.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is the Tea Party Libertarian, Authoritarian, or Something Else?

Author

Listed:
  • Jonathan Havercroft
  • Justin Murphy

Abstract

Objective Research on the Tea Party finds that both libertarian and authoritarian attitudes drive support for this movement, but political scientists lack a satisfactory explanation of this contradiction. Methods Factor analysis of nine attitudes from the 2012 American National Election Study is used to explore whether statism and moral traditionalism are intercorrelated on a dimension distinct from attitudes toward government; regression analysis is used to test if these distinct dimensions help to explain support for the Tea Party. Results Controlling for several competing explanations, the multiplicative interaction of anti‐government and morally statist ideological factors is shown to be a predictor of Tea Party support, especially among conservatives. Conclusion Our results suggest the Tea Party movement is in part driven by what Nietzsche called “misarchism,” an ideological mixture of moralism, statism, and libertarianism he first observed in Herbert Spencer.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathan Havercroft & Justin Murphy, 2018. "Is the Tea Party Libertarian, Authoritarian, or Something Else?," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 99(3), pages 1021-1037, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:99:y:2018:i:3:p:1021-1037
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12495
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12495
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.12495?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:99:y:2018:i:3:p:1021-1037. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.