IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v99y2018i3p1006-1020.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Trust Attitudes Promote Grassroots Lobbying in the American States

Author

Listed:
  • John Cluverius
  • Kevin K. Banda

Abstract

Objectives Despite declining trust in government institutions, political scientists have observed increasing political participation across activities, including grassroots lobbying. We argue that higher levels of trust in the state political system as a whole—diffuse political trust—and in state legislatures—specific political trust—should increase the likelihood that citizens contact their state legislators about policy matters because higher levels of trust tend to correlate with believing that the policy‐making process produces equitable political outcomes. Methods We use observational data from a nationally representative survey sample taken in 2015. Results We find mixed results: whereas diffuse political trust predicts participation in grassroots lobbying at the state level, specific political trust does not. Conclusion This finding implies that more general feelings of political trust exert greater influence on grassroots lobbying behavior than do more institution‐specific indicators of trust.

Suggested Citation

  • John Cluverius & Kevin K. Banda, 2018. "How Trust Attitudes Promote Grassroots Lobbying in the American States," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 99(3), pages 1006-1020, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:99:y:2018:i:3:p:1006-1020
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12486
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12486
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.12486?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:99:y:2018:i:3:p:1006-1020. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.