IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v99y2018i2p563-582.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Achieving Efficiency Without Losing Accuracy: Strategies for Scale Reduction with an Application to Risk Attitudes and Racial Resentment

Author

Listed:
  • Krista Loose
  • Yue Hou
  • Adam J. Berinsky

Abstract

Objectives Researchers often employ lengthy survey instruments to tap underlying phenomena of interest. However, concerns about the cost of fielding longer surveys and respondent fatigue can lead scholars to look for abbreviated, yet accurate, variations of longer, validated scales. In this article, we provide a template to aid in scale reduction. Methods The template we develop walks researchers through a procedure for using existing data to consider all possible subscales along several reliability and validity criteria. We apply our method to two commonly used scales: the seven†item Risk Attitudes Scale and the six†item Racial Resentment Scale. Results After applying the template, we find a four†item Risk Attitudes Scale that maintains nearly identical reliability and validity as the full scale and a three†item Racial Resentment Subscale that outperforms the two†item Subscale currently used in a major congressional survey. Conclusions Our general template should be of use to a broad range of scholars seeking to achieve efficiency without losing accuracy when reducing lengthy scales. The code to implement our procedures is available as an R package, ScaleReduce.

Suggested Citation

  • Krista Loose & Yue Hou & Adam J. Berinsky, 2018. "Achieving Efficiency Without Losing Accuracy: Strategies for Scale Reduction with an Application to Risk Attitudes and Racial Resentment," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 99(2), pages 563-582, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:99:y:2018:i:2:p:563-582
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12414
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12414
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.12414?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:99:y:2018:i:2:p:563-582. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.