IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v99y2018i2p536-552.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Legal Theory to Practical Application: A How†To for Performing Vote Dilution Analyses

Author

Listed:
  • M. V. Hood
  • Peter A. Morrison
  • Thomas M. Bryan

Abstract

Objectives The Supreme Court opinion in Thornburg v. Gingles three decades ago established a three†prong test whereby a vote dilution claim can be substantiated. This article provides practitioners and social scientists with a working understanding of the operational steps involved in analyzing a vote dilution claim. Methods A brief primer is offered on how to translate the Gingles preconditions into a set of practical, real†world tests. At each stage, we buttress these explanations with examples from actual court proceedings. Results This primer furnishes readers with the basic knowledge necessary to carry out a vote dilution analysis under the current legal standard. Conclusion While the generic process for conducting a test of vote dilution has been well†defined by decades of case law, practitioners should be mindful that some aspects of these procedures will continue to be affected by future court proceedings.

Suggested Citation

  • M. V. Hood & Peter A. Morrison & Thomas M. Bryan, 2018. "From Legal Theory to Practical Application: A How†To for Performing Vote Dilution Analyses," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 99(2), pages 536-552, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:99:y:2018:i:2:p:536-552
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12405
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12405
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.12405?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:99:y:2018:i:2:p:536-552. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.