IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v98y2017i5p1313-1327.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Do We Value Most in Schools? A Study of Preference Rankings of School Attributes

Author

Listed:
  • Mamdouh Hassan
  • Benny Geys

Abstract

Objectives A key question in education policy as well as individuals’ school choice involves the characteristics of schools we value most. It is thereby important to understand any heterogeneity in parents’, teachers’, and school principals’ preference rankings driven by their education level, gender, and age. Method In this article, we propose a survey†based approach to examine preference rankings of diverse school attributes, which accounts for tradeoffs required in real†world choice situations. Results Our results indicate that stakeholders on average rank the “ethical†aspects of schools (such as pupil and staff happiness and equality of opportunities) above their “efficiency†aspects (such as academic achievement or school size). Yet, respondents’ role in the school as well as their education level, gender, and age influence observed preference rankings. Conclusions To avoid biased inferences, survey designs on school preferences should account for the fact that real†world choices in favor of one particular characteristic often imply giving up at least some others. Doing so, we show that parents, teachers, and school principals appear to disagree with the predominant consideration awarded to academic achievement in current education policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Mamdouh Hassan & Benny Geys, 2017. "What Do We Value Most in Schools? A Study of Preference Rankings of School Attributes," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 98(5), pages 1313-1327, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:98:y:2017:i:5:p:1313-1327
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12337
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12337
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.12337?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:98:y:2017:i:5:p:1313-1327. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.