IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v98y2017i4p1216-1232.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

NASA's Quest for Human Spaceflight Popular Appeal

Author

Listed:
  • Roger D. Launius

Abstract

Objective Analyze NASA's efforts to “sell†both its mission and its successes from its origins in 1958 to the present. Methods Use public opinion polling and qualitative sources to establish change over time. Results Study suggests that NASA's public support was less important than most have previously asserted, and that the overall activities of NASA have been advanced by a small base of supporters, challenged by a small group of opponents, and sustained by a larger number of people who accept a status quo in space exploration. Conclusion A general public lack of support for expending many dollars on spaceflight has been a fundamental reality of NASA since its beginning. It is not changing, and probably not changeable, in the predictive future. Accordingly, NASA's quest for human spaceflight's popular appeal remains an elusive goal.

Suggested Citation

  • Roger D. Launius, 2017. "NASA's Quest for Human Spaceflight Popular Appeal," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 98(4), pages 1216-1232, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:98:y:2017:i:4:p:1216-1232
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12473
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12473
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.12473?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:98:y:2017:i:4:p:1216-1232. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.