IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v88y2007i1p51-67.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Too Close to Call? Uncertainty and Bias in Election‐Night Reporting

Author

Listed:
  • Joseph E. Uscinski

Abstract

Objective. Previous research has found that early election‐night projections can have a depressing effect on turnout in presidential elections. Although this effect has been found to be small in the past, it may be enough to sway state outcomes and, potentially, the final outcomes of close presidential and other elections. Therefore, this article analyzes the election‐night presidential projections of the three major cable news networks in 2000 and 2004 to examine the forces that lead to the timing of election‐night calls. Method. I collect the on‐air projection times of the cable news networks from videotapes, transcripts, and network documents. I apply duration analysis, specifically Cox models, to examine the forces that lead networks to make projections when they do. Results. Results of duration analysis indicate that while the cable networks timed their state‐by‐state projections primarily on the competitiveness of the state presidential races, network competition appears to drive projections at the beginning of election night. Furthermore, I find that early in the night in 2000, the cable networks appeared to call states sooner for Al Gore than for George W. Bush when controlling for the competitiveness of the state presidential races. Conclusions. This article provides support for Republican allegations of biased election‐night projections in 2000. However, it appears that because the networks amended their election‐night procedures, there were no miscalls or differences in how cable networks called states for the two presidential candidates in 2004.

Suggested Citation

  • Joseph E. Uscinski, 2007. "Too Close to Call? Uncertainty and Bias in Election‐Night Reporting," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 88(1), pages 51-67, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:88:y:2007:i:1:p:51-67
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2007.00446.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2007.00446.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2007.00446.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:88:y:2007:i:1:p:51-67. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.