IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v87y2006i3p519-539.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Moving Beyond Tokenism: Ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment and the Election of Women to State Legislatures

Author

Listed:
  • Jocelyn Elise Crowley

Abstract

Objective. State legislative bodies that contain more than a token level (15 percent) of female representatives provide these lawmakers with a greater sense of self‐efficacy and opportunities for wider policy influence than those where women number under 15 percent. The objective of this study is to determine the set of factors that carry states across this critical threshold, with a particular emphasis on the political mobilization effects of the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) ratification drive. Method. This study used event‐history analysis methods on state‐level data collected from 1972–2000. Results. I find that states that ratified the ERA, but not states that ratified only later to rescind, had a higher likelihood of crossing this token threshold as compared with states that never ratified at all. These results obtain even after controlling for the social eligibility pool of female candidates, the political opportunity structure, the social context of each state, and preexisting levels of female representation. Conclusions. The ERA ratification campaign during the 1970s and early 1980s created long‐lasting, state‐level effects in electing women through its role as a political education tool as well as through its symbolic power.

Suggested Citation

  • Jocelyn Elise Crowley, 2006. "Moving Beyond Tokenism: Ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment and the Election of Women to State Legislatures," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 87(3), pages 519-539, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:87:y:2006:i:3:p:519-539
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2006.00394.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2006.00394.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2006.00394.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:87:y:2006:i:3:p:519-539. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.