IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v86y2005i2p444-462.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Race, Political Empowerment, and Minority Perceptions of Judicial Fairness

Author

Listed:
  • L. Marvin Overby
  • Robert D. Brown
  • John M. Bruce
  • Charles E. Smith, Jr.
  • John W. Winkle, III

Abstract

Objective. Recent studies of the impact of black elite electoral success on the system‐supporting attitudes of black citizens have yielded mixed, but generally unimpressive, empirical results. We extend this limited research by examining the effects of the presence of black judicial officials on public attitudes toward a state judicial system. Methods. We employ data from a telephone survey of citizens in Mississippi and develop multivariate models to test for the effects of black judges on citizens' evaluations of the fairness of judges, equity in sentences, and overall impartiality of the state judicial system. Results. We find no systematic evidence that the election of black judicial officials ameliorates the suspicions of the black public regarding the fairness of the state courts. Conclusions. Our findings are in line with other recent studies on the limited effects of black elite electoral success on the attitudes of the black public and generally support a “political reality” model of political trust rather than an “empowerment model.”

Suggested Citation

  • L. Marvin Overby & Robert D. Brown & John M. Bruce & Charles E. Smith, Jr. & John W. Winkle, III, 2005. "Race, Political Empowerment, and Minority Perceptions of Judicial Fairness," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 86(2), pages 444-462, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:86:y:2005:i:2:p:444-462
    DOI: 10.1111/j.0038-4941.2005.00312.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0038-4941.2005.00312.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.0038-4941.2005.00312.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:86:y:2005:i:2:p:444-462. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.