IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v83y2002i1p244-262.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Remote Sensing to Evaluate Environmental Institutional Designs: A Habitat Conservation Planning Example

Author

Listed:
  • Charles M. Schweik
  • Craig W. Thomas

Abstract

Objective. Satellite‐based remote‐sensing analysis is a beneficial, yet underused, tool for environmental policy, planning, and evaluation. We identify its benefits and costs to encourage social scientists to consider the use of remote sensing as a tool for planning and evaluating environmental institutions. Methods. We analyze two multispectral Landsat Thematic Mapper satellite images to evaluate a habitat conservation plan (HCP) implemented pursuant to the Endangered Species Act. Results. Image analysis provides useful broad spatial scale information on HCP performance that is not discernible to the naked eye or through other methodologies. Conclusions. Satellite image analysis should be considered as a tool for planning and evaluating environmental institutional designs—despite the financial costs and requisite technical training. These images provide ecological and land cover change information that may not be available elsewhere. We provide lessons learned to help make analysts cognizant of some important issues surrounding the use of satellite‐based imagery for environmental institutional analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Charles M. Schweik & Craig W. Thomas, 2002. "Using Remote Sensing to Evaluate Environmental Institutional Designs: A Habitat Conservation Planning Example," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 83(1), pages 244-262, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:83:y:2002:i:1:p:244-262
    DOI: 10.1111/1540-6237.00081
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6237.00081
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1540-6237.00081?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:83:y:2002:i:1:p:244-262. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.