IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v82y2001i2p357-368.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Group Involvement and Democratic Orientations: Social Capital in the Postelection Context

Author

Listed:
  • Mark R. Joslyn
  • Allan Cigler

Abstract

Objective. This article tests the relationship between involvement in voluntary associations and attitudinal changes considered supportive of democratic principles and system legitimacy. Methods. We utilize 1996 pre‐ and postelection American National Election Studies panel data to test the proposed relationship. The effects of reported levels of group involvement are examined across three attitudinal measures of democratic support: trust in government, external efficacy, and absolute differences in postelection evaluations of the winning and losing candidates. Results. Greater involvement in voluntary organizations contributes to increased levels of postelection trust in government and external efficacy and a reduction in postelection polarization of comparative candidate evaluations. Conclusions. In addition to supporting the social capital proposition linking group involvement to orientations viewed as enhancing of democracy, this study also contributes to a growing literature linking individual‐level behavior to changes in systemic‐level attitudes.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark R. Joslyn & Allan Cigler, 2001. "Group Involvement and Democratic Orientations: Social Capital in the Postelection Context," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 82(2), pages 357-368, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:82:y:2001:i:2:p:357-368
    DOI: 10.1111/0038-4941.00028
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/0038-4941.00028
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/0038-4941.00028?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:82:y:2001:i:2:p:357-368. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.