IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v107y2026i5ne70184.html

Polarized by Education: Political Affiliation, Education, and Beliefs on the Free Market

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Ervin
  • Samuel H. Fishman

Abstract

Objective This article tests how education and political affiliation shape individuals’ political attitudes toward free‐market economics. Prior research finds that higher education levels are associated with more liberal political attitudes toward cultural issues—the “liberalization thesis.” However, this pattern may not hold for economic issues, especially surrounding free‐market economics. Methods For analysis, this article uses data from the World Values Survey (WVS) to model the association between political affiliation and respondent education with free‐market attitudes. Results In contrast with the liberalization thesis, we find that at higher levels of education, Democrat and Republican respondents are more polarized, respectively, in their attitudes toward free‐market economics compared to their Democrat and Republican peers at lower levels of education. Conclusion Our findings demonstrate the complexity of education's association with political attitudes, contrasting with commonly held beliefs about unified liberalizing effects of education. One plausible explanation is that education reinforces prior held economic attitudes, leading to greater consistency between political affiliation and attitudes toward the free market.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Ervin & Samuel H. Fishman, 2026. "Polarized by Education: Political Affiliation, Education, and Beliefs on the Free Market," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 107(5), September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:107:y:2026:i:5:n:e70184
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.70184
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70184
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.70184?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:107:y:2026:i:5:n:e70184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.