IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v107y2026i4ne70175.html

What Moves Love? Skin‐Tone Discrimination in the Dating Market in Mexico

Author

Listed:
  • Claudia Josselyn Barranco‐Santamaria
  • Raymundo M. Campos‐Vazquez

Abstract

Objective This study investigates skin‐tone discrimination in the Mexican dating market. We examine whether men's match responses differ between otherwise identical dating‐app profiles that vary only by skin tone, and whether these responses differ by men's own skin tone or education. Methods We implement a correspondence study across four Mexican cities. We created pairs of dating‐app profiles of women, identical in all details except that, within each pair, the photographs were digitally adjusted to show either light or dark skin. This design holds facial features and profile content constant. We analyze men's match responses to quantify the skin‐tone penalty. Results We document clear discrimination in favor of the light‐skinned profile. The match rate is 54% for light skin versus 35% for dark skin. We find no evidence of same‐skin‐tone homophily: darker‐skinned men discriminate against the dark‐skinned profile at rates similar to lighter‐skinned men. Regarding education, we do not observe that darker‐skinned men with a university degree discriminate more than those with lower education. Conclusions The findings show that skin tone shapes preference‐stage decisions in the Mexican dating market. These results complement observational evidence on partnering and colorism by documenting discrimination at an early stage of relationship formation, before actual dating, partnering, or marriage outcomes are observed.

Suggested Citation

  • Claudia Josselyn Barranco‐Santamaria & Raymundo M. Campos‐Vazquez, 2026. "What Moves Love? Skin‐Tone Discrimination in the Dating Market in Mexico," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 107(4), July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:107:y:2026:i:4:n:e70175
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.70175
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70175
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.70175?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:107:y:2026:i:4:n:e70175. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.