IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v107y2026i4ne70155.html

Extraversion, Gender, and the Perceived Pleasantness of Politics

Author

Listed:
  • Amanda Friesen
  • Isabella Rebasso
  • Jamie Hong Chow
  • Paul A. Djupe

Abstract

ObjectivesPolitics can be a social enterprise, with many of its activities taking place in public, and online engagement often involving others. As such, personality traits, such as extraversion, that define sociability may impact levels of socially related political involvement. While various works have examined the relationship between extraversion and political engagement, most have overlooked a key mechanism—the perceived pleasantness of political activities. This paper draws on research in political science and psychology to answer two questions: (1) Do extraverts find political activities more pleasant than non‐extraverts? (2) Does gender impact the relationship between extraversion and the pleasantness of political activities? MethodsWith several preregistered hypotheses, we test the links between extraversion, gender, pleasantness, and political activities. We collected novel survey data during the 2020 U.S. election cycle, measuring respondents' extraversion and the perceived pleasantness of social and nonsocial activities that either relate to politics or not. Ordinary least squares regression is used to model the relationship between extraversion and the perceived happiness felt during these activities. We split the sample and analysis by the political, social, and conflictual nature of these activities. We finally estimate the interaction between gender and extraversion. ResultsOur data suggest that individuals who score high on extraversion tend to rate nearly all political activities as more pleasant, but that this is driven neither by the social nor the conflictual character of political activities. We further find indications that extraverted men find political activities, and conflictual political activities in particular, more pleasant than equally extraverted women. ConclusionWe show that extraverts are more likely than introverts to enjoy political activities. However, in contrast to the often‐hypothesized mechanism, this is not driven by the social (or conflictual) character of political acts. This might suggest that politics may be perceived as social regardless of the activity itself or that other mechanisms link extraversion to political engagement. While extraversion predicts the pleasantness of politics similarly for men and women, a gender gap emerges at high levels of extraversion, which could help further illuminate the hidden mechanisms behind the gender gap in political engagement.

Suggested Citation

  • Amanda Friesen & Isabella Rebasso & Jamie Hong Chow & Paul A. Djupe, 2026. "Extraversion, Gender, and the Perceived Pleasantness of Politics," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 107(4), July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:107:y:2026:i:4:n:e70155
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.70155
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70155
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.70155?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:107:y:2026:i:4:n:e70155. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.