IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v107y2026i3ne70163.html

Young Radical Response: Senators React to Trump Conviction

Author

Listed:
  • Maggie Macdonald
  • Annelise Russell

Abstract

Objective Political Twitter is known for amplifying extreme views and polarizing rhetoric, and members of Congress capitalize on those fast‐paced news cycles to engage with trending topics. This research note uses the news of former President Donald Trump's conviction in his hush money trial to explain how U.S. senators engage with digital audiences, matching the more polarizing voices in the Senate with the ideological extremity of Twitter. Methods This study leverages the Senate's reaction to Trump's conviction as a case study to analyze senators' rapid response online. The work also highlights how measurement choices about senators' responses are critical to understanding digital engagement by elite actors. Results Young, ideologically extreme senators dominated the rapid response online, reflecting the realities of a digital audience divided into partisan echo chambers. Conclusion Our findings contribute to the growing scholarship on digital dynamics in Congress, offering insights into how senators use social media to signal their policy preferences and how patterns of response match perceptions of digital constituencies.

Suggested Citation

  • Maggie Macdonald & Annelise Russell, 2026. "Young Radical Response: Senators React to Trump Conviction," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 107(3), May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:107:y:2026:i:3:n:e70163
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.70163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70163
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.70163?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:107:y:2026:i:3:n:e70163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.