IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v107y2026i3ne70162.html

Generational Shifts and Gendered Divides: Exploring Attitudes on Social, Cultural, and Political Issues in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • April K. Clark
  • Izabelle P. Chick
  • Juliet E. Carlisle
  • Eric R. A. N. Smith

Abstract

Objective We examine how gendered differences in political attitudes have evolved in the United States across generations and historical contexts. Utilizing Gallup Poll Social Survey Series (GPSS) data (2000–2024), we analyze public opinion across three issue domains: care and social protection, social stability and societal change, and morality and rights conflict. Methods Cross‐classified random effects modeling assesses whether gender gaps reflect generational replacement (cohort effects) or changes over time (period effects). Results Period effects account for much of the observed change in socio‐political attitudes, while cohort effects play a limited role. Although men and women differ in their opinions, their attitudes generally move in parallel, leaving the gender gap stable over time. Women consistently express greater concern than men on issues including hunger and homelessness, crime and violence, drug use, healthcare access, and the environment. Conclusion These findings challenge narratives of increasing gender polarization. Despite intensified public discourse on issues such as race, abortion, gun policy, and LGBTQ+ right, gender gaps remain relatively stable, suggesting that perceived polarization may reflect elite‐driven framing more than mass‐level divergence.

Suggested Citation

  • April K. Clark & Izabelle P. Chick & Juliet E. Carlisle & Eric R. A. N. Smith, 2026. "Generational Shifts and Gendered Divides: Exploring Attitudes on Social, Cultural, and Political Issues in the United States," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 107(3), May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:107:y:2026:i:3:n:e70162
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.70162
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70162
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.70162?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:107:y:2026:i:3:n:e70162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.