IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v107y2026i3ne70149.html

Meeting Students Where They Are: A Field Experiment of Classroom Interventions for Voter Turnout Among College Students

Author

Listed:
  • Timothy Bynion
  • Jennifer Nicoll Victor

Abstract

Objective The goal of this project is to test the effectiveness of various get‐out‐the‐vote (GOTV) strategies on college students’ propensity to vote in state and local elections. Methods We conduct a field experiment testing different types of GOTV activities at a large public university during a low salience local election. Undergraduate classes were randomly assigned to receive a short peer‐led voting presentation, emails with voting information, or no contact. Results We verified voting using the state voter file and found that students who received an in‐person presentation were 11 percentage points more likely to vote than those who received no voting encouragement from the study. We did not observe a statistically significant effect from email encouragement. Conclusion Our findings are consistent with prior literature on voter mobilization and suggest that low cost GOTV efforts, such as email campaigns, are not likely to be effective at driving student turnout.

Suggested Citation

  • Timothy Bynion & Jennifer Nicoll Victor, 2026. "Meeting Students Where They Are: A Field Experiment of Classroom Interventions for Voter Turnout Among College Students," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 107(3), May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:107:y:2026:i:3:n:e70149
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.70149
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70149
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.70149?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:107:y:2026:i:3:n:e70149. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.