IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v107y2026i2ne70145.html

The Crooked Pictures in Our Heads: Partisan Cable Coverage of Congress

Author

Listed:
  • Adam J. Schiffer

Abstract

Objectives Partisan cable networks such as Fox News and MSNBC have the potential to polarize their audiences through a wide array of coverage choices. This study examines one of them: the choice of which members of the US House of Representatives to cover on each network. Two questions are answered: (1) How do the networks portray the composition of each party, compared to their actual compositions, along several politically important dimensions? (2) Which members receive more coverage on their aligned network than on the opposition network, and vice‐versa? Methods Using an original content analysis of Fox and MSNBC mentions of every US House member from 2019 to 2022, statistical analysis is used to model the factors that predict being mentioned on a network. Results Both networks greatly distort the composition of both parties. The distortion is usually in a similar direction for each party, but of a greater magnitude for the network's opposition party. The biggest distortion is that coverage goes overwhelmingly to members with heavy social media engagement. Conclusions The show horses of Congress outshine the workhorses on partisan cable news, in a manner that may contribute to affective polarization.

Suggested Citation

  • Adam J. Schiffer, 2026. "The Crooked Pictures in Our Heads: Partisan Cable Coverage of Congress," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 107(2), March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:107:y:2026:i:2:n:e70145
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.70145
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70145
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.70145?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:107:y:2026:i:2:n:e70145. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.