IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v107y2026i2ne70141.html

Life‐Cycle and Generational Influences on Chinese Political Behavior and Attitudes: Age Matters, and so Does Context

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Harmel
  • Zhaoqing Li
  • Chen Shen
  • Yao‐Yuan Yeh

Abstract

Objective This article aims to revisit the relative importance of age versus generation in explaining differences of political behavior and attitudes across age cohorts in China, assess the impact of contextual changes affecting multiple age groups, and identify special characteristics of attitudes and behavior of Generation Z. Method Analysis of differences among age cohorts using survey data for 2019 and differences for each cohort between 2008 and 2019 using two nationwide surveys. Results Findings suggest (1) roles for both age and generation in explaining differences among cohorts, (2) special features of Gen Z as compared to older generations, and (3) roles of contextual factors (period effects) in affecting change across multiple generations. Conclusion Not only does age influence political behavior and attitudes in authoritarian China but so does context, both later in life and particularly during formative years. When taking age, generation, and period effects into account, there is no single explanation that applies to all types of attitude and behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Harmel & Zhaoqing Li & Chen Shen & Yao‐Yuan Yeh, 2026. "Life‐Cycle and Generational Influences on Chinese Political Behavior and Attitudes: Age Matters, and so Does Context," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 107(2), March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:107:y:2026:i:2:n:e70141
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.70141
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70141
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.70141?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:107:y:2026:i:2:n:e70141. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.