Author
Abstract
Objectives Political polarization has intensified across democracies, shaping increasingly extreme political landscapes and posing significant challenges to effective governance. Despite extensive research on polarization, the fundamental determinants of party polarization remain contested. This study investigates public opinion, specifically political trust, as a critical yet underexplored factor influencing party polarization, offering a fresh perspective on its impact in diverse democratic contexts. Methods This study employs a linear regression model using the integrated datasets from 1971 to 2016, from the AmericasBarometer, American National Election Studies (ANES), Eurobarometer, World Value Survey (WVS) Wave 5, and the Varieties of Democracy (V‐Dem) project's V‐Party database. Results Contrary to conventional arguments, ideological polarization does not display a significant association with party polarization in the general model and shows mixed effects across specific policy domains. At the same time, it has a positive influence on party divergence in presidential systems. In contrast, trust polarization emerges as a significant and consistent force driving party polarization. Conclusion These findings challenge traditional frameworks prioritizing ideological alignment as the primary driver of party polarization, reframing the discussion to emphasize trust polarization as a central determinant. By offering new insights into the interplay between public trust in government and party behavior, this study contributes to a deeper understanding of party polarization and provides implications for democratic stability.
Suggested Citation
Solbi Kim, 2026.
"Citizen Voices Reshaping Politics: How Public Trust Shapes Party Polarization,"
Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 107(1), January.
Handle:
RePEc:bla:socsci:v:107:y:2026:i:1:n:e70124
DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.70124
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:107:y:2026:i:1:n:e70124. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.