IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v106y2025i7ne70120.html

Polarized Equality? Ideological and Affective Divides Over Gender Equality in Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Cyrill Otteni

Abstract

Objective This study examines polarization over gender equality in Europe, an issue that has received limited attention in the polarization literature despite growing politicization and opposition, particularly from conservative and far‐right actors. Methods The analysis draws on original survey data collected in ten European countries in fall 2022. It integrates ideological and affective dimensions of polarization. Affective polarization is assessed using feeling thermometers to examine in‐group favoritism and out‐group hostility between supporters and opponents of gender equality. Results The findings reveal substantial affective polarization between supporters and opponents of gender equality, with stronger in‐group favoritism and out‐group hostility among supporters. Polarization over gender equality aligns with existing partisan and ideological cleavages, especially among New Left and far‐right political groups. Conclusion The study extends research on affective polarization beyond partisanship by demonstrating the relevance of issue‐based group identities centered on gender equality. It contributes to a deeper understanding of how gender equality, politicization, and polarization intersect in contemporary Europe and offers a new methodological approach for studying the polarization of political issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Cyrill Otteni, 2025. "Polarized Equality? Ideological and Affective Divides Over Gender Equality in Europe," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 106(7), December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:7:n:e70120
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.70120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70120
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.70120?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:7:n:e70120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.