IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v106y2025i7ne70114.html

Primary Elections and Mail Voting

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Ritter
  • Caroline Tolbert

Abstract

Objective A problem for US democracy may be very low voter turnout in midterm primary elections, which has been associated with increasing ideological polarization in Congress and state legislatures. Turnout in these elections averages 20% and overwhelmingly represents partisan rather than unaffiliated voters. This study argues that earlier research has underestimated the effects of primary reforms, as it has not accounted for a key mediating factor: the growth in mail‐in voting ballots. Methods Utilizing the 2022 voter file data combined with historical voting data from millions of Americans across all states, this study hypothesizes that open and nonpartisan primaries, along with the availability of mail voting, increase the likelihood of individual turnout in congressional primaries. Results The results indicate that state mail voting laws (universal mail voting or no‐excuse absentee mail voting) and more widespread use of mail voting ballots can boost turnout in primary elections, particularly when combined with open or nonpartisan primary rules. Mail voting implementation—as measured by the percentage of total votes cast by mail—has the largest positive effect on increasing turnout in open or nonpartisan primary states, followed by closed primary states. Conclusion It is important to consider overlapping laws when evaluating election reforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Ritter & Caroline Tolbert, 2025. "Primary Elections and Mail Voting," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 106(7), December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:7:n:e70114
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.70114
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70114
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.70114?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:7:n:e70114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.