IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v106y2025i7ne70109.html

The Effects of SNAP Work Requirement on Recidivism

Author

Listed:
  • Sungjin Lee

Abstract

Objective This paper examines the impact of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) work requirement on recidivism among ex‐offenders. Methods Using offender‐level data from the National Corrections Reporting Program (2010–2017), this paper employs Linear Probability and Proportional Hazard models within a difference‐in‐difference framework. Two SNAP policy variations are used, the work requirement imposition and lifetime ban policies, which affect offenders differently depending on their release dates, counties of residence, types of offenses, and age at release. Results Exposure to the SNAP work requirement increased the probability of returning to prison within three years by 0.22 percentage points for non‐drug offenders and 0.47 percentage points for drug offenders. The effect was strongest among young (18–29), male, and unconditionally released ex‐offenders. No significant impacts were found for offenders exempt from the requirement, such as those aged 50 and above or drug offenders in states with lifetime bans. Conclusion The SNAP work requirement modestly increases recidivism among populations facing barriers to employment. Conditioning food assistance on work may undermine reentry outcomes. These findings highlight the need to reconsider the design of work requirements in safety net programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Sungjin Lee, 2025. "The Effects of SNAP Work Requirement on Recidivism," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 106(7), December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:7:n:e70109
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.70109
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70109
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.70109?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:7:n:e70109. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.