IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v106y2025i7ne70108.html

Mirrorball Politics: How Taylor Swift Reflects America's Partisan and Gender Divides

Author

Listed:
  • Laurel Elder
  • Steven Greene
  • Jeff Gulati
  • Mary‐Kate Lizotte

Abstract

Objectives This study explores public opinion toward global pop star Taylor Swift as a focal point gaining insights into contemporary political and social dynamics in the United States. Methods Drawing on national survey data, we investigate the intersection of partisanship, age, gender attitudes, and perceptions of Taylor Swift, a highly visible and successful woman. Results Our study reaches three important conclusions: First, views on Taylor Swift, like so much else in our society, are highly polarized by party and play an independent role in reinforcing partisan identities. Second, one of the sharpest divides on Taylor Swift is between Gen Z women and men, reflecting the pronounced gender divide among young voters that played a pivotal role in the 2024 presidential election. Finally, other than partisanship, the largest determinant of attitudes toward Taylor Swift is hostile sexism, wherein advances by women are seen as a threat. This effect manifests primarily among men, especially Republican men. Conclusion Like a “Mirrorball,” Swift has become a reflection of our society's deepest social and political fault lines and offers warning signs for the future of American politics.

Suggested Citation

  • Laurel Elder & Steven Greene & Jeff Gulati & Mary‐Kate Lizotte, 2025. "Mirrorball Politics: How Taylor Swift Reflects America's Partisan and Gender Divides," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 106(7), December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:7:n:e70108
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.70108
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70108
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.70108?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:7:n:e70108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.