IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v106y2025i6ne70102.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deindustrialization, Identity Politics, and Public Support for Liberal Policies in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Haining Du

Abstract

Objective This study examines the structural economic roots of negative identity politics in the United States, focusing on whether deindustrialization—rather than trade or automation alone—drives the rise of White identity politics. Methods Using an instrumental variables approach with local manufacturing layoffs and nationally representative survey data, the analysis tests the link between deindustrialization and racial resentment among Whites and assesses its effects on redistribution preferences and partisan affective polarization. Results Deindustrialization significantly increases racial resentment among Whites but has no comparable effect on non‐Whites. It does not meaningfully increase support for redistribution or heighten partisan affective polarization. Conclusion These findings suggest that economic shocks are channeled primarily into symbolic racial politics rather than partisan affective polarization or material policy demands.

Suggested Citation

  • Haining Du, 2025. "Deindustrialization, Identity Politics, and Public Support for Liberal Policies in the United States," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 106(6), November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:6:n:e70102
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.70102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70102
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.70102?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:6:n:e70102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.