IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v106y2025i6ne70100.html

Unveiling the Shadows: Corruption, Informal Economies, and Income Inequality in Low‐Income Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Brandon Parsons
  • Ayoub Rabhi

Abstract

Objective The objective was to analyze how corruption, the informal economy, and their interaction influence income inequality in 43 low‐income countries between 1990 and 2019. Method The study uses Machado and Silva's Quantile via Moments regression and fixed‐effects models with Driscoll and Kraay's robust standard errors. The quantile approach is used to test whether effects vary across different levels of income inequality. Results In lower income countries, corruption, the informal economy, and their interaction generally reduce income inequality, especially at higher inequality quantiles, suggesting a moderating effect when income disparities are larger. However, when examined together, the interaction of corruption and the informal economy can exacerbate inequality. In higher income countries, both corruption and the informal economy consistently increase inequality, showing a contrasting dynamic. Conclusion The findings suggest corruption acts as “grease” in lower income countries with weak institutions by expanding opportunities for poorer groups, while in higher income countries with stronger institutions, corruption and the informal economy function as “sand,” undermining institutions and distorting benefits toward the wealthy.

Suggested Citation

  • Brandon Parsons & Ayoub Rabhi, 2025. "Unveiling the Shadows: Corruption, Informal Economies, and Income Inequality in Low‐Income Countries," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 106(6), November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:6:n:e70100
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.70100
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70100
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.70100?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:6:n:e70100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.