IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v106y2025i6ne70098.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Digital Spin: Political Agenda Setting on Alternative Social Media Platforms

Author

Listed:
  • Amira Jadoon
  • Ayse Lokmanoglu
  • Tess Hemmila
  • Ananya Gupta
  • Arie Perliger
  • Bart Knijnenburg

Abstract

Objective This study examines how agenda setting operates in today's hybrid media ecosystem by investigating how mainstream political events during the 2024 US election year were discussed on alternative social media platforms. Methods The study analyzes over 2000 mainstream news articles about high‐profile political events from January to March 2024, and related discourse across Facebook, Gab, Truth Social, and Telegram using Structural Topic Modeling and sentiment analysis. Results Alternative platforms create parallel information ecosystems that challenge traditional mechanisms of agenda setting. Three dominant topics emerged: Trump and election issues (40%), global conflict and US foreign policy (20%), and immigration (20%). These narratives exploit fear and anger with negative tones, but also incorporate humanizing language. Conclusions Alternative platforms construct parallel information ecosystems that rival traditional agenda‐setting mechanisms.

Suggested Citation

  • Amira Jadoon & Ayse Lokmanoglu & Tess Hemmila & Ananya Gupta & Arie Perliger & Bart Knijnenburg, 2025. "The Digital Spin: Political Agenda Setting on Alternative Social Media Platforms," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 106(6), November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:6:n:e70098
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.70098
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70098
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.70098?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:6:n:e70098. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.