IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v106y2025i6ne70096.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Opinion Page Media Depictions of Renewable Energy Geopolitics and Energy Security

Author

Listed:
  • Chinedu C. Nsude
  • Victoria A. Johnson
  • Claire M. Burch
  • Darren E. Purcell

Abstract

Objective The geopolitics of energy has been prominent in political rhetoric since the 1970s, with an emphasis on energy security. This study asks how renewable energy is framed through the lens of formal geopolitics on the opinion pages of four national newspapers in the United States, as opposed to news coverage, and links the frames to wider geopolitical concerns surrounding energy as a whole. Methods Drawing from the Factiva database, 144 editorials and op‐eds from 1980 to 2021 were included in a corpus for content analysis with an inductive, team‐based, coding process. Results Positive narratives of renewable energy and energy security were generic but invoked energy independence. Negative narratives highlighted the sector's lack of capacity. Other framings included reducing dependence of foreign energy sources, contributions to environmental protection, and global economic competition to develop renewable technologies. Discussion Our analysis shows that renewable energy technologies were framed as contributors to energy security, helping reduce dependence on foreign energy, assisting with climate change mitigation, and contributing to U.S. dominance in renewable energy technology.

Suggested Citation

  • Chinedu C. Nsude & Victoria A. Johnson & Claire M. Burch & Darren E. Purcell, 2025. "Opinion Page Media Depictions of Renewable Energy Geopolitics and Energy Security," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 106(6), November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:6:n:e70096
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.70096
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70096
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.70096?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:6:n:e70096. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.