IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v106y2025i6ne70091.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Failure of the Contact Hypothesis—Exposure to Religious Diversity Conditions Apocalyptic Politics

Author

Listed:
  • Paul A. Djupe
  • Anand E. Sokhey
  • Jacob R. Neiheisel
  • Andrew R. Lewis

Abstract

Background The recent jump to study worldviews like apocalypticism and Christian nationalism has left open questions about the social role of religion in the production of prejudice and politics. Objectives We take up the longstanding finding that social contact across lines of difference can tamp down prejudice, especially when such contact is goal‐driven. Specifically, we ask if this relationship holds in the context of apocalyptics– individuals who see the other side as evil, spiritual and physical warfare as ongoing, and prejudice against Christians as widespread. Methods Using data collected in the spring of 2023, we explore the extreme politics of apocalyptics when they are exposed to greater and lesser degrees of religious diversity. Results Contrary to the usual associations from the intergroup contact thesis, we find that apocalyptics exposed to diversity dig in with even more extreme orientations to politics – they display a greater need for chaos, more support for extreme groups, and more support for potentially using violence to reclaim America. Conclusions Apocalyptics view American politics and society as being at the breaking point and their negative reactions to diverse others may just push the US past that point.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul A. Djupe & Anand E. Sokhey & Jacob R. Neiheisel & Andrew R. Lewis, 2025. "The Failure of the Contact Hypothesis—Exposure to Religious Diversity Conditions Apocalyptic Politics," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 106(6), November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:6:n:e70091
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.70091
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70091
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.70091?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:6:n:e70091. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.