IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v106y2025i6ne70085.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Irrelevance of “Peak Fame” on Celebrity Candidate Success

Author

Listed:
  • Richard T. Longoria
  • Dana Reyes

Abstract

Objective Does it matter “when” a celebrity runs for office? The political scientists who study celebrity candidates need to consider an important insight from communications and media scholars. Fame is a time‐dependent variable. Someone who was famous 40 years ago may no longer be widely known today. Methods A list of celebrity political candidates who ran for office in the United States between 1865 and 2022 was created to measure campaign success. Results In terms of winning an election, it does not matter whether a celebrity candidate runs at the peak of their fame or waits until decades later. What does matter is how famous they are at the time they run for office. Conclusions A‐ and B‐list celebrities are more electorally successful than C‐list celebrities so long as their ranking tracks their level of fame over time. Future research on this topic needs to account for the ephemeral nature of fame.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard T. Longoria & Dana Reyes, 2025. "The Irrelevance of “Peak Fame” on Celebrity Candidate Success," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 106(6), November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:6:n:e70085
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.70085
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70085
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.70085?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:6:n:e70085. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.