IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v106y2025i5ne70086.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Relative Contributions of Changes in Vertical and Horizontal Mechanisms to Overall Changes in Occupational Gender Segregation in the United States, 2006–2019

Author

Listed:
  • Ronald Kwon
  • William Scarborough
  • Katherine Sobering
  • Tasmiah Amreen

Abstract

Objective In this article, we examine how the expansion of feminized industries impacted horizontal and vertical patterns of occupational gender segregation. Methods We apply Thiel's H to data drawn from the American Community Survey (2006–2019) and run regression and counterfactual analyses. Results Horizontal shifts accounted for 74% of the decline in occupational gender segregation during the study period, while changes to vertical patterns accounted for 26%. Conclusion The expansion of feminized industries appeared to have reduced segregation in recent decades primarily through horizontal, rather than vertical, gender integration.

Suggested Citation

  • Ronald Kwon & William Scarborough & Katherine Sobering & Tasmiah Amreen, 2025. "The Relative Contributions of Changes in Vertical and Horizontal Mechanisms to Overall Changes in Occupational Gender Segregation in the United States, 2006–2019," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 106(5), September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:5:n:e70086
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.70086
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70086
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.70086?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:5:n:e70086. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.