IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v106y2025i5ne70082.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Ego‐Tropic and Socio‐Tropic Perceptions on Vote Choice in Constitutional Referendums: Evidence From Chile in 2022

Author

Listed:
  • Gonzalo Espinoza Bianchini
  • Patricio Navia
  • Thomas Abarca Olave

Abstract

Objective We analyze how economic perceptions shaped voting behavior in Chile’s 2022 constitutional referendum, where voters rejected a proposed new constitution. Methods Using survey data from a two‐wave online national poll (N = 1,957) conducted before and after the referendum, we estimate multinomial logit models to assess the effects of socio‐tropic (national) and ego‐tropic (personal) economic perceptions—current and prospective—on vote choice, controlling for ideology and presidential approval. Results Results: Positive socio‐tropic and prospective ego‐tropic evaluations increased the likelihood of supporting the new constitution, while positive current ego‐tropic assessments were associated with rejection. These effects were strongest among centrist and center‐right voters, indicating that moderates without strong ideological ties to the government were particularly responsive to economic considerations. Conclusion Economic perceptions independently shaped vote choice, supporting the view of constitutional referendums as second‐order elections where voters “take their wallets” to the polls, not just their views on constitutional content.

Suggested Citation

  • Gonzalo Espinoza Bianchini & Patricio Navia & Thomas Abarca Olave, 2025. "The Impact of Ego‐Tropic and Socio‐Tropic Perceptions on Vote Choice in Constitutional Referendums: Evidence From Chile in 2022," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 106(5), September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:5:n:e70082
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.70082
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70082
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.70082?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:5:n:e70082. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.