IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v106y2025i5ne70081.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fear of a Dying Planet and Fear of a Dying God: Beliefs About God and Attitudes toward Climate Change in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Rebecca Bonhag
  • Laura Upenieks

Abstract

Objective Beliefs about the nature of God have been associated with a variety of social and political attitudes in the sociological literature. This study examined how a sense of attachment to God, accountability to God, and the belief in a God who is invested in the national success of the United States—a “patriotic God”—are associated with the pressing concern of attitudes toward climate change. Methods Drawing on data from the 2021 Values and Beliefs of the American Public Survey (n = 1213), the results showed that stronger belief in a patriotic God was linked with decreased enthusiasm around climate change laws. Results Further, when compared to those with a high attachment to God, both those with a low sense of attachment and agnostics/atheists showed greater approval of laws to fight climate change. By contrast, the results for a link between accountability to God and favoring stronger environmental laws were much less clear. Discussion We discuss our findings in light of current sociological literature concerned with climate change and policymakers who may need to address not only political but also religiously motivated opposition to their aims.

Suggested Citation

  • Rebecca Bonhag & Laura Upenieks, 2025. "Fear of a Dying Planet and Fear of a Dying God: Beliefs About God and Attitudes toward Climate Change in the United States," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 106(5), September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:5:n:e70081
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.70081
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70081
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.70081?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:5:n:e70081. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.