IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v106y2025i5ne70077.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Restrictive State Electoral Environments and the Health of Black Americans

Author

Listed:
  • Scot Schraufnagel
  • Dawn Hunter
  • Robert Durbin
  • Gnora Mahs

Abstract

Objective The research tests the effect that restrictive state election laws have on the self‐reported health of Black Americans. Methods Initially, aggregate bivariate relationships are assessed as an exercise in theory building before moving to individual‐level survey data to test the association between a more restrictive state electoral environment and self‐reported health. We employ logistic regression to ascertain the predicted probability that individual respondents report they have either very good or excellent health. Results The results suggest a more restrictive electoral environment associates with lower self‐reported health for all survey respondents, but the association grows stronger for Black Americans. This is the case after controlling for other considerations that scholars routinely identify as influencing individual health outcomes. Conclusion The implication is that removing barriers to registering to vote and casting a ballot on Election Day, in the American states, would create a more evenhanded electoral system where all voices can equally influence the political decision‐making that promotes personal health.

Suggested Citation

  • Scot Schraufnagel & Dawn Hunter & Robert Durbin & Gnora Mahs, 2025. "Restrictive State Electoral Environments and the Health of Black Americans," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 106(5), September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:5:n:e70077
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.70077
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70077
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.70077?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:5:n:e70077. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.