IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v106y2025i5ne70067.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Staffing Elections

Author

Listed:
  • Matt Lamb
  • Barry Burden
  • Robert Stein

Abstract

Objective We identify two different dimensions of retaining poll workers: the successful retention of experienced, more seasoned poll workers and the continued participation of newer, less experienced poll workers. Methods Using a unique national survey of poll workers, we test separate explanations for the successful retention of experienced and inexperienced (newer) poll workers. A web‐based survey of poll workers (n = 4529) in 19 counties within 10 states was conducted before the 2022 midterm election. Results The retention of experienced poll workers is largely shaped by their positive affect and their tenure working the polls. The retention of less experienced poll workers is influenced by interactions with voters, poll watchers, and the compensation they receive for working the polls. Conclusion We find the correlates of retaining experienced and less experienced poll workers are sufficiently different to support a bifurcation in the ways local election officials go about staffing elections. While far from definitive, our findings suggest a nascent strategy for staffing elections, as well as a framework for the future study regarding the recruitment and retention of poll workers.

Suggested Citation

  • Matt Lamb & Barry Burden & Robert Stein, 2025. "Staffing Elections," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 106(5), September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:5:n:e70067
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.70067
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70067
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.70067?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:5:n:e70067. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.