IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v106y2025i4ne70065.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Tale of Two Kingdoms: State‐Level Political Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility

Author

Listed:
  • Michael S. Rocca
  • Wendy Hansen
  • Miao “Alfred” Wang

Abstract

Objective This research note explores the relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and the political environment, focusing on the impact of state‐level political determinants on Fortune 500 companies' CSR ratings. Method We conduct OLS regression on 485 Fortune 500 companies’ 2020 CSRHub ratings, with standard errors clustered by state. Key independent variables include state partisanship and partisan control of state government, with controls for firm size, political activity, sector, region, and unionization. Results Our analysis reveals a significant correlation between the political leaning of a company's home state and its CSR rating, with firms in states that favored President Biden exhibiting higher CSR ratings. Additionally, companies in states with divided government control tend to have higher CSR ratings, suggesting that a balanced political environment may encourage more robust CSR efforts. Finally, the study uncovers a relationship between corporate political activities, such as lobbying and political contributions, and CSR engagement, indicating that firms view CSR as a strategic element of their broader nonmarket strategies. Conclusion These findings highlight the strategic role of CSR in corporations’ navigation of the political landscape, offering new insights into the motivations behind corporate social responsibility initiatives in today's politically charged environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael S. Rocca & Wendy Hansen & Miao “Alfred” Wang, 2025. "A Tale of Two Kingdoms: State‐Level Political Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 106(4), July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:4:n:e70065
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.70065
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70065
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.70065?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:4:n:e70065. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.