IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v106y2025i4ne70063.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Segmented Intersectionality and Job Loss: Unpacking Race, Gender, and Occupational Segregation

Author

Listed:
  • Xi Chen

Abstract

Objective This study introduces a segmented intersectionality approach to enhance intersectionality theory and empirical research. It investigates involuntary job loss among full‐time U.S. workers, emphasizing how race and gender interact within a segregated occupational structure. Methods Using data from the 2000–2022 Current Population Survey, logistic regression models estimate job loss probabilities based on race, gender, age, education, occupation, and industry. Decomposition analysis evaluates the extent to which observed disparities result from group differences in characteristics versus differences in returns to those characteristics. Results Latina women and Black youth face significantly higher probabilities of involuntary job loss than other groups, even after controlling for relevant covariates. Disparities between men and women and between Latino and White workers are largely attributable to differences in occupational, industrial, and educational characteristics. In contrast, the Black–White gap is mainly driven by unequal returns to these characteristics. Men generally have higher job loss rates than women, due primarily to gender‐based occupational segregation. Conclusion Involuntary job loss is shaped by both structural inequalities and differential labor market returns. While occupational segregation explains disparities for some groups, others face systemic devaluation of their attributes. These findings highlight the segmented nature of intersectionality in the labor market.

Suggested Citation

  • Xi Chen, 2025. "Segmented Intersectionality and Job Loss: Unpacking Race, Gender, and Occupational Segregation," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 106(4), July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:4:n:e70063
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.70063
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70063
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.70063?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:4:n:e70063. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.