IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v106y2025i4ne70062.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Occupational Prestige of Law Enforcement Officers: Quantifying Self and Public Perceptions of Prestige

Author

Listed:
  • Katelin M. Alfaro Hudak
  • Aidan Combs
  • Robert E. Freeland
  • Elizabeth A. Mumford

Abstract

Objective Perceptions of occupational prestige are commonly associated with job satisfaction and job turnover intentions, but little is known about how law enforcement officers (LEOs) view the prestige of policing. We quantify how LEOs rate the prestige of policing and how they think their communities view policing. We evaluate the extent to which LEO understandings of public perceptions match actual public perceptions. Methods We estimated occupational prestige using traditional and multidimensional measures in a nationally representative sample of LEOs. Results Officers view their occupation as more prestigious, morally good, and active, but less powerful than they believe the public sees it. Officers’ understandings of public view of policing are more pessimistic than warranted by the public's actual views. Officers viewed their occupations as less prestigious and believed the public's perceptions of the prestige and “goodness” of policing were significantly lower following the onset of the COVID‐19 pandemic and George Floyd's murder. Conclusions Our results highlight the need to study social psychological processes involved in officer self‐perceptions and their understanding of the communities with which they interact.

Suggested Citation

  • Katelin M. Alfaro Hudak & Aidan Combs & Robert E. Freeland & Elizabeth A. Mumford, 2025. "Occupational Prestige of Law Enforcement Officers: Quantifying Self and Public Perceptions of Prestige," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 106(4), July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:4:n:e70062
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.70062
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70062
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.70062?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:4:n:e70062. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.