IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v106y2025i4ne70048.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Status Threat, Political Competition, and the Expansion of Voter Identification Laws in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Francesco Bromo

Abstract

Objective Voter identification requirements in the U.S. are on a dramatic uptick and are becoming less forgiving. When do states phase in or adopt stricter voter ID laws? I propose an elite‐driven explanation. Building on the “racial threat” hypothesis, I argue that these provisions are a legal device exploited by legislators representing white majorities to safeguard the status quo in view of the “threat” posed to the establishment by the growing size of racial minorities, and that this effect is moderated by political competition. I introduce the concept of “majority gap,” the surplus of population belonging to the majority in relation to the size of all minority groups combined. Methods I test my theory in the context of state legislatures, using two‐way fixed‐effects regression. Results I show that, on average, Republicans present voter identification‐related proposals twice as often as Democrats and that governors rarely interfere with these proposals. I find that when Republicans control both chambers of a state assembly, the shrinking magnitude of the majority gap is associated with a significant expansion in ID requirements. Conclusion This article contributes to the research on the disenfranchisement of racial minorities by shedding some light on the expansion of voter identification laws as a mechanism for White‐controlled legislatures to potentially “gatekeep” the polls.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesco Bromo, 2025. "Status Threat, Political Competition, and the Expansion of Voter Identification Laws in the United States," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 106(4), July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:4:n:e70048
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.70048
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70048
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.70048?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:4:n:e70048. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.