IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v106y2025i4ne70041.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mindfulness and Trust: Survey Evidence on the Relationship Between Mindfulness Practice, Trait Mindfulness, and General Social Trust

Author

Listed:
  • Calvin Blackwell
  • Rhonda Swickert

Abstract

Objective Building on the established link between short‐term mindfulness and pro‐social behavior, we investigate the relationship between trait mindfulness, long‐term practice, and general social trust. Methods Using the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire, we survey 644 adult US citizens about their mindfulness habits and trait mindfulness. Additionally, we gather socio‐demographic and personality information and ask participants the social trust question from the General Social Survey. Using logistic regressions, we estimate the impact of trait mindfulness and practice upon social trust. Results We find that individuals who meditate regularly and for a longer duration are more trusting. Regular meditators are up to twice as likely to exhibit social trust as those who seldom meditate. Although it is not statistically significant, trait mindfulness is correlated with greater trust. We also find that the subscale measuring non‐reactivity is positively and statistically significantly related to trust. A one standard deviation increase in non‐reactivity increases the likelihood of exhibiting social trust by 20%–30%. Conclusion We argue that long‐term mindfulness is positively related to general social trust. This relationship represents an actionable policy organizations can use to improve general social trust, an aspect often missing from the academic literature on trust.

Suggested Citation

  • Calvin Blackwell & Rhonda Swickert, 2025. "Mindfulness and Trust: Survey Evidence on the Relationship Between Mindfulness Practice, Trait Mindfulness, and General Social Trust," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 106(4), July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:4:n:e70041
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.70041
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70041
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.70041?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:4:n:e70041. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.