IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v106y2025i3ne70035.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Partisanship and Mental Health: Help Seeking and Institutional Trust in a Polarized Country

Author

Listed:
  • Jeffrey Lyons
  • Ellen J. Schafer
  • Michael Touchton
  • David Doherty

Abstract

Objective The objective of this study is to demonstrate an association between partisanship and institutional trust and mental health help seeking. Methods The 2022 Cooperative Election Study, administered by Harvard University and YouGov, includes a national stratified sample; a subset (n = 1000) responded to additional questions about mental health and were included in this study. Using regression models, relationships between partisanship and mental health outcomes were analyzed. Results The findings indicate Republicans are less likely than Democrats to report seeking help for mental health and are less trusting of institutions that supply mental health information. Trust in state health departments is moderated by the partisanship of the state the respondent lives in; Republicans are more trusting of state health departments in states that are governed by Republicans than in states governed by Democrats. Conclusion Associations between partisanship and institutional trust and help seeking are large and highlight the need for public health and mental health practitioners to study and consider partisanship.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeffrey Lyons & Ellen J. Schafer & Michael Touchton & David Doherty, 2025. "Partisanship and Mental Health: Help Seeking and Institutional Trust in a Polarized Country," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 106(3), May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:3:n:e70035
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.70035
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70035
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.70035?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:106:y:2025:i:3:n:e70035. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.